A CashoutReady claim arrives as two instruments: a 30+ page written report and a shareable interactive Source-of-Wealth map - the same decision system banks run these reviews on, pointed at your case. Every section answers one question a compliance officer is going to put to you anyway, in the order they tend to ask.
The previews below are illustrative sample data, drawn from the same components the live ChainComply platform renders.
Scattered activity across venues becomes one interpretable breakdown. This is the step that no amount of exporting and formatting does on its own.
From scattered activity to one clear wealth story
ChainComply pulls your activity together across exchanges for fiat and crypto, self-custody wallets, DeFi positions and margin accounts (100+ CEXs, 150+ blockchains served).
It reconciles that into one Source-of-Wealth breakdown, keeping your capital gains, trading and deposits apart from third-party flows rather than merging them into a single total.
At the same time it surfaces the signals a bank screens for - gambling, high-risk venues, mixers - so they reach the reviewer from you, with context, rather than from their own tooling without any.
Both instruments read from this one reconstruction: the written report cites it page by page, and the interactive map lets your bank explore it directly.
The question it answers “How much of this wealth is accounted for, and is any of it a problem?”
A reviewer decides in the first minute whether a file is worth reading. The summary opens with the figure that matters - how much of the balance the report explains, and from where - alongside the illicit-activity risk position and the count of flagged items. Nothing is buried.
The question it answers “What is actually held today, and where does it sit?”
The report states what you hold at the reporting date, venue by venue - exchange balances, self-custody wallets and any DeFi positions, each priced in your bank's currency. The closing figure your bank sees on the transfer ties back to holdings it can inspect, rather than standing on its own.
The question it answers “Did this build up plausibly over time, or appear all at once?”
Wealth built over six years does not read as a single transfer, so the report lays it out in sequence. Each event carries its date, amount, venue, transaction identifier and its share of the total, which lets a reviewer follow the accumulation rather than take the closing figure on trust.
The question it answers “Are the trading profits real, and can they be tied to venues?”
Trading gains are the hardest claim to evidence and the easiest to overstate. The report charts realised profit and loss per exchange account and per asset over the full period, so a gain of six figures is shown as the outcome of a visible sequence of positions.
The question it answers “Who sent this money, and what stands behind them?”
For each significant inflow the report names the venue or counterparty, states what the relationship is, and shows the path the funds took to reach you. Indirect exposure is included, because a reviewer who finds it later will ask why it was left out.
The question it answers “What will our own screening find that this file did not mention?”
Every counterparty is screened against sanctions lists and high-risk categories, and the findings appear in the report whether or not they flatter the case. A medium-risk signal that you disclose and explain costs you a paragraph; the same signal found by the bank after the fact costs you the relationship.
The question it answers “How much of the picture is missing, and does it matter?”
No reconstruction of on-chain and exchange activity is ever total, so the report states its own coverage: which accounts and periods are included, which transactions could not be priced or matched, and what that leaves unexplained. A stated gap is a fact a reviewer can work with.
The question it answers “Can we explore this ourselves rather than take the summary as read?”
Some reviewers want to click through the flows rather than read about them. The interactive map is not an appendix - it is the other half of the claim: the same evidence as a navigable graph of accounts, counterparties and flows, shared with the bank alongside the written report.
A Source-of-Wealth provider that claims more than this is selling you something a bank will not accept. These limits are the reason the report carries weight.
Your bank owns the decision, and CashoutReady says so on the face of the report. What the report changes is the quality of the evidence the decision rests on.
Screening results appear in the report whether or not they help. A flag you disclose and explain costs you a paragraph; the same flag found afterwards costs you the relationship.
Where activity cannot be reconstructed or priced, the data completeness section states the gap and its size. A stated gap is something a reviewer can work with; a silent one is not.
The report quantifies realised gains and can inform a tax conversation, but it is a Source-of-Wealth report for a bank, not a return for a tax authority.
There is no subscription and no per-report surprise. Cases beyond the standard volume are priced on the first call, before any work starts.
€980
per Source-of-Wealth package
None of this is collected through the website. It is gathered after the first call, under a separate agreement covering the report.
Describe where the bank stopped and ChainComply will tell you what a file would need to cover, and whether it is worth commissioning at all.
